Samples of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

Samples of the very best abstracts submitted to your 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to displace self-government and control of land and resources represents an important “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is really what happened once that space was recovered.

The main topic of this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the real history associated with Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of in the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the period between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks due to the fact Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the fight to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, as well as the grouped community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power in the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse and also the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking community identity that is mashpee. This research examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to construct a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation and also the Evolving Community Identity when you look at the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors plus the Creation of National Parklands within the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and organizations that are non-governmental the creation of parklands through the American South. An investigation of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation while current historiography primarily credits the federal government with the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the necessity of local and non-government sources for the preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the importance of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but give attention to opposition towards the imposition of the latest rules governing land in the face of some threat that is outside. In spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the importance of local individuals when you look at the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples in the American South raise concerns concerning the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained curiosity about both nature preservation plus in creating spaces for public recreation in the local level, and finds that the “private way to public parks” merits investigation that is further.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks when you look at the American South” was subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced a rich literature about the Levellers and their role within the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to increase the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty happens to be central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they might make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to discover a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. Instead of concentrating on John Lilburne, often taken whilst the public face of this Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and a lot more consistent thinker, William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement in the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i am hoping to claim that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Although the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s commitment to a society that is tolerant a secular state really should not be minimized but rather recognized as part of a larger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to subscribe to the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study of the First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they have grown to be the normative expectation within American society. When it comes to great majority of American history, however, events commonly labeled as “mass murder” have lead to no memory that is permanent as well as the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city together with nation could forget the tragedy and move ahead. All of this changed on May 29, 1989 once the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial to the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the case of Edmond to be able to understand just why it became the first memory site of this kind in united states of america history. I argue that the little town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities on the day regarding the shooting, coupled with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions for the emergence of this unique form of memory site. I also conduct a historiography associated with use of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how it offers get to be the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society in the late 20th century. Lastly, I illustrate how the notable lack of communication between people mixed up in Edmond and Oklahoma City cases following the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of those cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising quantity of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The pursuit of Postmortem Identity throughout the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in a variety of ways which incorporated a variety of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the full case of the “ash and embers.” By the turn of the first century with this era, the Romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of this anonymous Roman also succinctly explained. Cremation vanished by the next century, replaced by the practice associated with distant past because of the fifth century. Burial first began to take hold into the western Roman Empire throughout the early second century, using the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world would not discuss the practices of cremation and burial in detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in form of burial vessels such as for instance urns and sarcophagi represented truly the only location to check out investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a small corpus //edubirdies.org/write-my-paper-for-me of such vessels in order to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols to your fragments of text available associated with death when you look at the Roman world. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by a heightened desire from the section of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.